If you must send you-m indeed? a true message?lusieurs people
diff?ntes, do you put the question if these people will need to or not
use between them the allowing button of ' r?ndre?ous'?


If the r?nse is not, then do not reveal?ous winds the addresses of
your recipients. For the prot?r, do not place by their addresses
e-mail in the field ': ', nor in field ' DC: (Copy certified) '. Place
to them plut?dans the field ' CCI' (which means ' Copies carbons
invisibles'. According to your software of transport, it can that this
field is masqu?ar d?ut and that you must ask for his posting, to be
able to be used it). In pla?t your addresses multiple in this field '
CCI', you will?terez to diffuse the addresses of each one?out

the world.

But why should one?ter reveal all the
addresses, in our messages? Is Parce it pr?s?nt in the address books
and the lists of recipients of the messages Re? in the computers '
repugnant? that truths virus r?ltent the valid addresses e-mail and
exploit them to diffuse itself. If you send?0 people a mall containing
the addresses of all in ' clair', you multiply by 20 the risk that ALL
these addresses are soon collect? (at one or the other of your
friends, against his gr?pour to allow the virus to be propagated
him-m? or, sometimes, so that they are exploit? at the time of sending
of publicit?on d?r?(spam)... While wanting to inform your friends of
a?ntuel virus (creditable intention), you do not render service to
them, because you contribute?ugmenter the risk which they are victims
of the ' spamming'... eh yes!

Information source: Eric R.